![]() |
Center for Business, Industry & Labor |
|
www.cbil.org |
|
![]() |
| Menu |
|
|
|
|
|
The Role of "Lean" in Today's Hypercompetitive Economy“Lean” has become the term of the year throughout the manufacturing, healthcare, and service sectors of our economy. In fact, it would be quite difficult to find any plant manager or hospital administrator who would admit to having no interest in Lean work processes. To make such a statement would be close to professional suicide. When asked if their organization is “doing Lean,” the typical response from these managers would be, “of course,” followed by a recitation of Lean tools being used such as 5S, Value Stream Mapping, Visual Management, Six Sigma, Work Cell Redesign, Single Minute Exchange of Die, Pull Production, and others.
Why is there such a high level of enthusiasm about Lean? How is it that a discipline that is successful in fewer than 37% of the organizations that attempt to implement it, is still a number one item on the agenda of leaders throughout most sectors of our economy? One would be hard pressed to name another performance improvement process with such a high level of popularity coupled with such a relatively low level of quantified, long-term impact. How can this incongruity be explained?
One obvious reason for the popularity of Lean is that when implemented successfully Lean delivers very high impact results. For example, clients served by CBIL’s Lean Manufacturing Business Unit have reported results such as these:
And there’s another reason for the popularity of Lean. As McKinsey & Company point out in their November, 2008, Quarterly, “(Lean) technical solutions are objective and straightforward; analytical solutions to operational problems abound in Lean and Six Sigma tool kits; and companies make significant investments to train experts who know how to apply them. What’s more, the tools and experts actually are invaluable in diagnosing and improving operational performance.”
So the “Lean” fixes do work. Unfortunately, in a large percentage of cases the gains are temporary. Far too often Lean just doesn’t stick.
But Lean can, and does, stick, delivering consistent, long-term increases in productivity, product quality, and productivity. What spells the difference between the failure of Lean and the success of Lean? It’s the ability of an organization’s managers and supervisors to effectively drive and support an organization’s transition to Lean. It takes managers and supervisors who understand the values that undergird Lean work processes. It takes managers and supervisors who understand that Lean changes the way in which management and labor interact with each other. It takes managers and supervisors who are able to take risks. It takes managers and supervisors with a renewed appreciation for the potential of line workers. When organizations don’t have managers and supervisors with these skills and knowledge, Lean fails. No exceptions.
To address this critical need, the St. Louis Community College’s Center for Business, Industry, & Labor has developed a “Lean Leadership Certificate Program.”
Encompassing ten seminars, this program provides managers and supervisors with the skills and knowledge they need in order to support the successful implementation of Lean work processes. Here are some comments from participants in this program:
This Lean Leadership Certificate Program could be the best investment your organization ever made as it works toward being a winner in the highly competitive 21st Century marketplace. Call us now and let’s schedule a time to review this program. You can reach me anytime at 314.303.0612.
George Friesen, MA
|
|
|
Operational Efficiency and Bottom-Line Results
on target, on demand, on site training and consulting services
300 South Broadway,
St. Louis, MO 63102-2810
Phone: 314-539-5310
Fax: 314-539-5349
![]()
| Contact CBIL |
© 2011 St. Louis Community College |
CBIL Privacy Policy | Text
Only |
| Legal Disclaimer |
Accommodations Statement | Non-Discrimination
Statement |
September 28, 2011
|